Roughly 46 million American households have opted to rent rather than buy their homes because of convenience, cost or availability. But renting isn’t always a cheaper or better alternative to owning a property.
The right road to take depends on a variety of factors, including an individual’s or family’s financial means and how well the local real-estate market is doing. Like home prices, rental rates can vary significantly by region, state or city. In some cases, renting will prove to be more cost-effective and a better overall value than owning.
To determine where renters can get the most bang for their buck, WalletHub compared more than 180 rental markets based on 21 key measures of rental attractiveness and quality of life. Our data set ranges from the difference between rental rates and mortgage payments to rental affordability, the cost of living and job availability.

Chip Lupo, WalletHub Analyst
Main Findings
Best Places to Rent
| Overall Rank | City | Total Score | Rental Market & Affordability Rank | Quality of Life Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scottsdale, AZ | 69.05 | 24 | 1 |
| 2 | Gilbert, AZ | 67.63 | 6 | 9 |
| 3 | Chandler, AZ | 67.20 | 11 | 5 |
| 4 | Overland Park, KS | 66.94 | 9 | 4 |
| 5 | Columbia, MD | 65.80 | 2 | 39 |
| 6 | Peoria, AZ | 65.25 | 22 | 2 |
| 7 | Bismarck, ND | 63.60 | 3 | 55 |
| 8 | Huntsville, AL | 63.10 | 4 | 38 |
| 9 | Sioux Falls, SD | 62.33 | 1 | 108 |
| 10 | Amarillo, TX | 60.18 | 20 | 34 |
| 11 | Nashua, NH | 59.81 | 37 | 14 |
| 12 | Plano, TX | 59.78 | 78 | 7 |
| 13 | Austin, TX | 59.28 | 33 | 26 |
| 14 | Lincoln, NE | 59.08 | 15 | 56 |
| 15 | Casper, WY | 58.84 | 16 | 62 |
| 16 | Mesa, AZ | 58.62 | 49 | 21 |
| 17 | Glendale, AZ | 58.48 | 54 | 20 |
| 18 | South Burlington, VT | 58.38 | 13 | 71 |
| 19 | Phoenix, AZ | 58.28 | 39 | 27 |
| 20 | Irvine, CA | 57.37 | 139 | 3 |
| 21 | Charleston, SC | 57.32 | 59 | 18 |
| 22 | Cheyenne, WY | 56.96 | 18 | 79 |
| 23 | Manchester, NH | 56.86 | 44 | 31 |
| 24 | El Paso, TX | 56.86 | 76 | 19 |
| 25 | Tempe, AZ | 56.58 | 53 | 29 |
| 26 | Fremont, CA | 56.45 | 81 | 23 |
| 27 | Henderson, NV | 56.19 | 47 | 42 |
| 27 | Fargo, ND | 56.19 | 5 | 126 |
| 29 | Tampa, FL | 55.90 | 134 | 8 |
| 30 | Charleston, WV | 55.80 | 17 | 97 |
| 31 | Mobile, AL | 55.79 | 26 | 85 |
| 32 | Warwick, RI | 55.50 | 38 | 52 |
| 33 | Wichita, KS | 55.41 | 12 | 104 |
| 34 | Grand Prairie, TX | 55.39 | 119 | 10 |
| 35 | Denver, CO | 54.91 | 10 | 110 |
| 36 | Rapid City, SD | 54.81 | 8 | 138 |
| 37 | Laredo, TX | 54.61 | 41 | 65 |
| 38 | Colorado Springs, CO | 54.01 | 23 | 103 |
| 39 | Portland, ME | 54.01 | 100 | 24 |
| 40 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 53.96 | 14 | 133 |
| 41 | Juneau, AK | 53.77 | 21 | 121 |
| 42 | San Francisco, CA | 53.75 | 86 | 40 |
| 43 | Montgomery, AL | 53.65 | 27 | 100 |
| 44 | Tucson, AZ | 53.64 | 82 | 44 |
| 45 | Fort Smith, AR | 53.49 | 7 | 153 |
| 46 | Atlanta, GA | 53.40 | 63 | 64 |
| 47 | Orlando, FL | 53.39 | 129 | 17 |
| 48 | Brownsville, TX | 53.38 | 62 | 63 |
| 49 | Arlington, TX | 53.36 | 92 | 41 |
| 50 | Fort Worth, TX | 53.26 | 85 | 46 |
| 51 | Boise, ID | 53.09 | 113 | 32 |
| 52 | Lewiston, ME | 53.00 | 125 | 16 |
| 53 | Omaha, NE | 52.90 | 40 | 88 |
| 54 | Chesapeake, VA | 52.89 | 46 | 86 |
| 55 | Raleigh, NC | 52.83 | 25 | 112 |
| 56 | Aurora, IL | 52.79 | 61 | 72 |
| 57 | West Valley City, UT | 52.56 | 66 | 70 |
| 58 | San Diego, CA | 52.46 | 146 | 15 |
| 59 | Pittsburgh, PA | 52.18 | 83 | 61 |
| 60 | Las Vegas, NV | 52.07 | 90 | 60 |
| 61 | Sacramento, CA | 52.03 | 132 | 28 |
| 62 | Fontana, CA | 51.85 | 109 | 37 |
| 63 | Corpus Christi, TX | 51.84 | 55 | 93 |
| 64 | San Antonio, TX | 51.66 | 70 | 83 |
| 65 | Virginia Beach, VA | 51.27 | 79 | 77 |
| 66 | Irving, TX | 50.88 | 97 | 66 |
| 67 | Huntington Beach, CA | 50.81 | 156 | 11 |
| 68 | North Las Vegas, NV | 50.65 | 65 | 95 |
| 69 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 50.35 | 155 | 13 |
| 70 | Richmond, VA | 50.35 | 75 | 94 |
| 71 | Dallas, TX | 50.16 | 108 | 69 |
| 72 | Newport News, VA | 50.12 | 60 | 107 |
| 73 | Chicago, IL | 50.08 | 30 | 131 |
| 74 | Columbia, SC | 49.82 | 71 | 102 |
| 75 | Wilmington, DE | 49.74 | 89 | 91 |
| 76 | Jacksonville, FL | 49.64 | 102 | 78 |
| 77 | San Jose, CA | 49.52 | 135 | 50 |
| 78 | Tulsa, OK | 49.47 | 94 | 92 |
| 79 | Garland, TX | 49.30 | 152 | 30 |
| 80 | Reno, NV | 49.24 | 84 | 98 |
| 81 | Lubbock, TX | 49.24 | 107 | 81 |
| 82 | Bakersfield, CA | 49.02 | 115 | 75 |
| 83 | Oklahoma City, OK | 48.91 | 64 | 114 |
| 84 | Seattle, WA | 48.84 | 45 | 127 |
| 85 | St. Louis, MO | 48.59 | 28 | 148 |
| 86 | Aurora, CO | 48.56 | 35 | 140 |
| 87 | Kansas City, MO | 48.54 | 32 | 142 |
| 88 | Durham, NC | 48.47 | 29 | 149 |
| 89 | Louisville, KY | 48.42 | 34 | 144 |
| 90 | Portland, OR | 48.31 | 42 | 137 |
| 91 | Little Rock, AR | 48.27 | 19 | 176 |
| 92 | Honolulu, HI | 48.25 | 159 | 33 |
| 93 | Nampa, ID | 48.20 | 117 | 84 |
| 94 | Albuquerque, NM | 48.12 | 56 | 134 |
| 95 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 47.99 | 69 | 119 |
| 96 | Garden Grove, CA | 47.87 | 177 | 12 |
| 97 | Santa Clarita, CA | 47.84 | 163 | 22 |
| 98 | Fort Wayne, IN | 47.72 | 74 | 118 |
| 99 | St. Petersburg, FL | 47.53 | 148 | 49 |
| 100 | Madison, WI | 47.39 | 112 | 99 |
| 101 | Washington, DC | 47.39 | 68 | 129 |
| 102 | Providence, RI | 47.34 | 88 | 116 |
| 103 | St. Paul, MN | 47.14 | 77 | 123 |
| 104 | Winston-Salem, NC | 47.11 | 50 | 143 |
| 105 | Des Moines, IA | 47.05 | 58 | 147 |
| 106 | New York, NY | 47.02 | 121 | 96 |
| 107 | Chula Vista, CA | 47.02 | 151 | 59 |
| 108 | Riverside, CA | 47.02 | 145 | 68 |
| 109 | Las Cruces, NM | 46.76 | 36 | 166 |
| 110 | Norfolk, VA | 46.69 | 93 | 117 |
| 111 | Fayetteville, NC | 46.44 | 57 | 155 |
| 112 | Billings, MT | 46.43 | 51 | 158 |
| 113 | Charlotte, NC | 46.33 | 52 | 150 |
| 114 | Minneapolis, MN | 46.33 | 48 | 154 |
| 115 | Tallahassee, FL | 46.24 | 122 | 101 |
| 116 | Rochester, NY | 46.22 | 111 | 109 |
| 117 | Ontario, CA | 46.18 | 162 | 36 |
| 118 | Salt Lake City, UT | 45.97 | 87 | 139 |
| 119 | Modesto, CA | 45.92 | 142 | 89 |
| 120 | Jersey City, NJ | 45.78 | 67 | 145 |
| 121 | Miami, FL | 45.68 | 161 | 53 |
| 122 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 45.67 | 182 | 6 |
| 123 | Grand Rapids, MI | 45.25 | 106 | 132 |
| 124 | Worcester, MA | 45.10 | 130 | 105 |
| 125 | Birmingham, AL | 45.09 | 101 | 130 |
| 126 | Yonkers, NY | 45.08 | 158 | 54 |
| 127 | Long Beach, CA | 45.06 | 166 | 58 |
| 128 | Fresno, CA | 45.05 | 133 | 106 |
| 129 | Greensboro, NC | 45.00 | 72 | 151 |
| 130 | Los Angeles, CA | 45.00 | 176 | 45 |
| 131 | Burlington, VT | 44.97 | 110 | 128 |
| 132 | Cincinnati, OH | 44.97 | 126 | 111 |
| 133 | Anchorage, AK | 44.77 | 31 | 173 |
| 134 | Stockton, CA | 44.73 | 103 | 135 |
| 135 | Anaheim, CA | 44.71 | 173 | 57 |
| 136 | Moreno Valley, CA | 44.68 | 167 | 48 |
| 137 | Columbus, OH | 44.68 | 116 | 122 |
| 138 | New Haven, CT | 44.65 | 150 | 82 |
| 139 | Chattanooga, TN | 44.59 | 118 | 125 |
| 140 | Santa Rosa, CA | 44.39 | 169 | 47 |
| 141 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 44.37 | 168 | 51 |
| 142 | Oceanside, CA | 44.26 | 172 | 43 |
| 143 | Gulfport, MS | 44.08 | 137 | 115 |
| 144 | Houston, TX | 44.01 | 127 | 120 |
| 145 | Glendale, CA | 43.93 | 179 | 25 |
| 146 | Cape Coral, FL | 43.92 | 178 | 35 |
| 147 | Oxnard, CA | 43.90 | 153 | 90 |
| 148 | San Bernardino, CA | 43.84 | 157 | 87 |
| 149 | Indianapolis, IN | 43.67 | 80 | 157 |
| 150 | Baltimore, MD | 43.46 | 43 | 175 |
| 151 | Santa Ana, CA | 43.45 | 171 | 73 |
| 152 | Spokane, WA | 43.31 | 91 | 160 |
| 153 | Springfield, MO | 43.24 | 73 | 171 |
| 154 | Bridgeport, CT | 43.23 | 164 | 74 |
| 155 | Salem, OR | 42.89 | 131 | 136 |
| 156 | Columbus, GA | 42.86 | 124 | 141 |
| 157 | Buffalo, NY | 42.82 | 98 | 156 |
| 158 | Boston, MA | 42.78 | 141 | 124 |
| 159 | Knoxville, TN | 42.61 | 147 | 113 |
| 160 | Vancouver, WA | 42.20 | 104 | 161 |
| 161 | Pearl City, HI | 42.03 | 165 | 67 |
| 162 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 41.63 | 175 | 80 |
| 163 | Dover, DE | 41.60 | 99 | 170 |
| 164 | Milwaukee, WI | 41.54 | 105 | 159 |
| 165 | Nashville, TN | 41.33 | 96 | 165 |
| 166 | Baton Rouge, LA | 40.89 | 95 | 168 |
| 167 | Hialeah, FL | 40.00 | 180 | 76 |
| 168 | Missoula, MT | 39.96 | 144 | 152 |
| 169 | Oakland, CA | 38.74 | 120 | 174 |
| 170 | Toledo, OH | 38.66 | 138 | 163 |
| 171 | Philadelphia, PA | 38.59 | 140 | 164 |
| 172 | Tacoma, WA | 38.21 | 128 | 177 |
| 173 | Shreveport, LA | 38.08 | 123 | 179 |
| 174 | Huntington, WV | 38.02 | 143 | 172 |
| 175 | Augusta, GA | 38.00 | 136 | 180 |
| 176 | New Orleans, LA | 36.51 | 154 | 162 |
| 177 | Newark, NJ | 36.08 | 149 | 169 |
| 178 | Akron, OH | 34.38 | 170 | 167 |
| 179 | Memphis, TN | 32.97 | 114 | 182 |
| 180 | Jackson, MS | 32.79 | 181 | 146 |
| 181 | Cleveland, OH | 32.02 | 174 | 178 |
| 182 | Detroit, MI | 29.95 | 160 | 181 |
Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.

- Most
- 1. Bismarck, ND
- 2. Sioux Falls, SD
- 3. Cedar Rapids, IA
- 4. Charleston, WV
- 5. Fargo, ND

- Least
- T-177. Newark, NJ
- T-177. Detroit, MI
- T-177. Miami, FL
- T-177. Jackson, MS
- T-177. Hialeah, FL

- Highest
- 1. Charleston, WV
- 2. Amarillo, TX
- 3. Baton Rouge, LA
- 4. Augusta, GA
- 5. Peoria, AZ

- Lowest
- 178. Fontana, CA
- T-179. Hialeah, FL
- T-179. Lewiston, ME
- 181. Nashua, NH
- 182. South Burlington, VT

- Lowest
- 1. San Francisco, CA
- 2. Glendale, CA
- 3. Fremont, CA
- 4. Los Angeles, CA
- 5. Oakland, CA

- Highest
- 177. Akron, OH
- 178. Toledo, OH
- T-179. Cleveland, OH
- T-179. Jackson, MS
- T-179. Detroit, MI

- Lowest
- 1. Brownsville, TX
- 2. Oklahoma City, OK
- 3. Amarillo, TX
- T-4. Des Moines, IA
- T-4. Tulsa, OK

- Highest
- T-166. Santa Rosa, CA
- T-166. Honolulu, HI
- T-166. Pearl City, HI
- T-166. San Jose, CA
- T-166. New York, NY

- Most
- 1. Port St. Lucie, FL
- 2. Warwick, RI
- 3. Gilbert, AZ
- 4. Cape Coral, FL
- 5. Irvine, CA

- Least
- 175. Kansas City, MO
- 176. Little Rock, AR
- 177. St. Louis, MO
- T-178. Memphis, TN
- T-178. Oakland, CA
In-Depth Look at the Best Places to Rent
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ, is the best place to rent, in large part due to the quality of life in the city. Scottsdale ranks as the best city for both the availability of jobs and the driving environment (traffic and infrastructure quality). It also has the fourth-best weather and the seventh-best recreation options.
Scottsdale isn’t the cheapest city to rent in, but it’s also far from the most expensive. It has the 57th-best rental affordability out of 182 cities, with most people only spending under 22% of their annual income on rent. The city also has one of the largest average home square footages in the country, at 2,179 square feet.
Finally, Arizona has state-level laws addressing bedbug infestations in rental properties, which further protects renters in Scottsdale.
Gilbert, AZ
Gilbert, AZ, is the second-best place to rent, boasting the 10th-highest average home square footage in the country, at 2,101 square feet. It also has the 37th-best rental affordability, with the average person only spending around 21% of their annual income on rent. In addition, only around 19% of households pay more than 50% of their income for housing, the 11th-lowest share in the country.
Gilbert, AZ is also a great place for people who have or plan to have kids, as it has a very good school system – 61% of public schools in the city get a rating of at least 7 out of 10 from Greatschools.org. While this may not seem like a high percentage, only 20 cities out of 182 in our study achieve percentages of 50% or higher. Gilbert has the third-lowest crime rate, too.
Chandler, AZ
Chandler, AZ, is the third-best place to rent in 2026, partly because most people only spend around 21% of their annual income on rent, and only around 20% of households spend more than 50% of their income on housing costs. Plus, the maximum security deposit that a landlord can charge is only two months’ rent.
In addition, homes in Chandler have a generous average square footage, at 1,888 square feet. There are plenty of new homes to choose from, too, as more than 17% of homes were built between 2010 and 2024. Lastly, Chandler, like its Arizonian counterpart above, also benefits from laws addressing bedbug infestations in rental properties.
Ask the Experts
Finding a suitable rental unit is a similar process to buying a home. Your search may be based purely on cost or also on needs, such as the number of bedrooms or close proximity to work. For guidance, we asked a panel of experts to share their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What tips do you have for a person looking to get the best value in an apartment?
- What are the most common mistakes that renters make when searching for a new apartment?
- In evaluating the best and worst cities for renters, what are the top five indicators?
- Are the fastest growing cities a good place for renters? Why?
- How can local policymakers make housing more affordable for renters without upsetting homeowners?
Ask the Experts
Ph.D. – Instructor, Department of Marketing - Southeast Missouri State University
Read More
Ed.D., MBA – Professor, Professional Studies, Phi Theta Kappa and Golden Key Honors Societies Advisor, Landmark College
Read More
Ph.D. – Associate Professor, College of Business and Management - Lynn University
Read More
Associate Professor of Law and Baker Botts LLP Professor in Law - University of Houston Law Center
Read More
Associate Professor in the Kate Tiedemann School of Business and Finance, University of South Florida, Muma College of Business
Read More
J.D., Assistant Extension Professor; Faculty Advisor, UConn Real Estate Society, Center for Real Estate and Urban Economic Studies, Department of Finance - UConn School of Business
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine the best local rental markets, WalletHub compared 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across two key dimensions, “Rental Market & Affordability” and “Quality of Life.”
We evaluated those dimensions using 21 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for renters. Data for metrics marked with an asterisk (*) were available at the state level only.
Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample. Our sample considers only the city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.
Rental Market & Affordability – Total Points: 60
- Share of Renters: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: This metric specifically measures the share of renter occupied housing units among total occupied housing units. - Rental Vacancy Rate: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Sublet Laws-Friendliness*: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Average Home Square Footage: Half Weight (~1.62 Points)
- Share of Newer Homes: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: “Newer Homes” include housing units built between 2010 and 2024. - Rental Affordability: Triple Weight (~9.73 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated as follows: Median Gross Rent / Median Annual Household Income. - Share of Apartment Community Pillar Listings: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: A Community Pillar landlord has agreed to relax their standard tenant screening process in order to help applicants with potential rental barriers—such as low incomes, spotty credit scores, unemployment, or lack of housing references—be able to obtain housing. - Historical Rental-Price Changes: Triple Weight (~9.73 Points)
Note: This metric specifically measures the year-over-year change in rent prices (2026 vs. 2025 vs. 2024). - Share of Severely Cost-Burdened Renter Households: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: “Severely Cost-Burdened Renter Households,” as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, refers to consumers who spend at least 50 percent of their income on housing. - Average Annual Renters-Insurance Premium*: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Rent-to-Price Ratio: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Cost of Living: Triple Weight (~9.73 Points)
- Security-Deposit Limit*: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: This metric measures the maximum security-deposit amount that landlords are allowed to charge in the state. A lower amount is ideal for renters.
Quality of Life – Total Points: 40
- City Satisfaction Index: Full Weight (~5.71 Points)
Note: This metric is based on Sharecare’s Well-Being “Community” Index Score, and refers to residents liking where they live, feeling safe and having pride in their community. - Job Market: Full Weight (~5.71 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Jobs” ranking. - Driver-Friendliness: Half Weight (~2.86 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities to Drive in” ranking. - Recreation-Friendliness: Full Weight (~5.71 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Recreation” ranking. - Weather: Half Weight (~2.86 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Cities with the Best & Worst Weather” ranking. - Quality of Public School System: Half Weight (~2.86 Points)
Note: This metric is based on GreatSchools.org’s ratings of U.S. public schools. - Safety: Double Weight (~11.43 Points)
Note: This metric measures the violent- and property-crime rates. - Presence of State Bedbug Laws*: Half Weight (~2.86 Points)
Note: This binary metric measures the presence or absence of bedbug laws in the state. Bedbug laws address bedbug infestations in rental properties.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected as of June 9, 2026 from the U.S. Census Bureau, Council for Community and Economic Research, Zillow, Insurance Information Institute, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Flex Zone, TurboTenant, Federal Bureau of Investigation, GreatSchools.org, National Association of REALTORS, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sharecare Community Well-Being Index, and WalletHub research.












WalletHub's personal finance experts are frequently cited by leading media outlets. Contact our media team to arrange an interview.